The digital information age: Boon or boondoggle?

TMI, meaning “Too Much information,” is usually used when someone shares a snippet of information that goes far beyond anything we would want to know about them.  Like when the guy behind you in the checkout line strikes up a conversation and then says, “After a couple of days I reverse my underwear to get an extra day or so of wear.”   Definitely TMI.

On the other hand TMI might be an appropriate assessment for a much greater phenomenon, the explosion of information available caused by the digital age.  It would seem that the more sources of knowledge we have, the less informed we become.

Although I lack scientific data to back it up, it would appear to the casual observer that with the increase of media sources has come a tendency to filter out much, if not all of the content that does not validate our preconceived notions.

Several years ago, while learning a difficult new system at work, a frustrated co worker questioned the need for continued technological advances and said that in her opinion, “the highest and happiest self-sustainable level of human society was the stone age.”

That statement has come back to mind many times over the years, always with the question: At what point did we stop living in complete harmony with nature and begin to alter it to fit our perceived needs?  And at what cost?

Consider the life style of the Pacific Islanders prior to the time when the voyages of Captain Cook brought them Christianity, European moral codes, modest clothing and sexually transmitted disease. Arguably being suddenly thrust into the then modern world did not increase their potential for happiness and harmonious living.

In many ways the computer age has been our Captain Cook and its promise of knowledge and edification has become, as a result of TMI, a reality of distraction and a narrowing of interests.

I don’t know if there is an acceptable answer to this conundrum, we certainly aren’t going to treat our computers and other digital devices to a modern day “Bonfire of the Vanities.”

One simple solution might be if we each adopt a new regimen when surfing the net; for every several sites visited that validate our preconceived ideas on a subject perhaps we should challenge ourselves by seeking out at least one that offers an opposing view.

There was a time, in recent history, when we all had to work to gain useful information and that effort strengthened our intellect.  We cannot afford to allow the lack of effort offered by the TMI digital age to cause our intellectual muscles to atrophy.

Thank you for your time.



About rixlibris

Retired from child care photography after thirty years of coaxing smiles and wiping noses. Currently venting years of repressed fictional story lines via self-published novels. Married and still alive in a remote corner of Waller County, Texas.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to TMI

  1. Just Plain Ol' Vic says:

    I actually feel that we have a case of TMO (too much opinion) that is vaguely disguised as TMI (too much information).

    See in my mind information implies facts, research and citing of credible sources. Those days of journalistic credibility are long gone and have been replaced by innuendo, hidden agendas and sensationalism.

    Perhaps it would be better if we stepped back to the days of the innocent natives?!

    • Hmm, I totally agree with your line of thought. I doubt the credibility of sources of information these days. Sensation sells and common sense has gone with sensation.

      • rixlibris says:

        This digital information age has actually made research more difficult. With so many sources, many of whom are “instant experts” proffering opinion instead of documented fact, it’s hard to know which bit of research can actually be relied on.

  2. rixlibris says:

    At the risk of losing a title tie-in to a popular and easily recognized abbreviation, I have to agree with you. I suppose that some political slant has been present in every newspaper since the beginning of the industry but that’s why the op-ed pages were created. Today we have the media’s political leanings apparent in that which is presented as hard news and instead of protesting, we simply narrow our choices to those that support our own biases. There is no growth in assimilating only that which validates preconception. I might support one side of the argument but I run the risk of becoming an automaton if I don’t at least consider the points being made by the opposition.

  3. Pingback: Featured Posts 118 – Share your post links. | a cooking pot and twistedtales

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s