SHOULD JUSTICE BE ALLOWED TO PEEK?

The July 11, 2016 edition of the Houston Chronicle carried an interview with Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, written by Adam Liptak.  Below is a short sampling taken from the article followed by a copy of a letter I wrote to the editorial page of the Chronicle.

“I can’t imagine what this place would be — I can’t imagine what this country would be —with Donald Trump as our president.  For the country it would be four years, for the court it could be — I don’t even want to contemplate that.”

“Now it’s time for us to move to New Zealand.”

“It was a credit to the eight member court that it deadlocked only four times given the ideological divide between its liberal and conservative wings, both with four members.”

“Think what would have happened (United States V. Texas) had Justice Scalia remained with us, a five justice majority would have issued a precedent-setting decision dealing a lasting setback to Obama and the immigrants he had tried to protect.”

Ginsburg

The letter represents my opinion on the matter.  I might add only that ideology and political opinion, being by their very nature biased, have no place in judicial proceedings.

 

Advertisements

About rixlibris

Retired from child care photography after thirty years of coaxing smiles and wiping noses. Currently venting years of repressed fictional story lines via self-published novels. Married and still alive in a remote corner of Waller County, Texas.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s