Here in the good old US of A we are engaged in what must be the most contentious presidential campaign in recent memory.  While no one is challenging duels and recruiting their seconds (yet), the verbal assaults, still early in the process, are ramping up to historic levels.  Through it all I am reminded of the sage advice concerning dissemination of gossip (read propaganda) most often attributed to Socrates: When you are about to share information concerning another ask yourself first, “is it true, is it kind, is it useful?”

“Is it true?”  Did you personally verify that what you have heard is correct rather than merely re-posting something that fits your preconceived notions?

“Is it Kind?”  Does what you are about to share show the person in a positive light or is it just ammunition to further an agenda of destruction?

“Is it useful?”  Will the person receiving the information be able to use it to enhance his or her own life?”

How we accept and process information concerning another person speaks volumes about how we feel towards that person.  Without regard to any expressed opinion to the contrary, our reaction to such revelations is always indicative of our true feelings.  If we care about the person, the subject of a negative report, we  will greet the information with skepticism and either dismiss it it or demand proof.

If, on the other hand, the unflattering information concerns someone we dislike, either overtly or secretly, we tend to welcome it and share it with others in order to enlist a mutual dislike for that person.

My candidate may very well be a paragon of virtue while yours is a dirty dealing opportunist bent on destroying the country for personal gain.  Even so, this still does not give me the moral or ethical right to spread false or unverified negative propaganda concerning the person you have chosen to support.

In a perfect world the unvarnished truth would suffice to propel a person to the top.  In that world it would still be incumbent upon each of us to verify and disseminate only that which we know to be the absolute truth.

Unfortunately following the dictates of Socrates requires effort, suspension of preconceptions and an abandonment of hidden agendas.

And so let the politics of personal destruction run rampant, allow the knees to continue to jerk and when this political season is over we can all go back to sniping at our friends and neighbors in order to stay in practice.

Personally, I’m voting for the other guy.

About rixlibris

Retired from child care photography after thirty years of coaxing smiles and wiping noses. Currently venting years of repressed fictional story lines via self-published novels. Married and still alive in a remote corner of Waller County, Texas.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to IS IT TRUE, IS IT KIND?

  1. Catherine Townsend-Lyon, Author says:

    Very well put! Great post.

    Author, Cat Lyon 🙂

  2. I admire your stance and this is a wonderful advice. I’ve always believed that we should put people in office for the true and greater good of everyone, not for their power of oration or whatever it is that politicians do. Great post.

    • rixlibris says:

      Thanks for your kind words. As for putting the people you describe into office, the problem is finding such folks that are electable, given that the process is driven by greed and a quest for power. As I’ve said before, the fastest, surest path to acquiring great wealth in the USA is to hold a national elective or appointed office. With few exceptions they enter office as persons of modest means, do nothing else for several decades and retire fabulously wealthy.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s