I recently posted a comment on the blog written by Ben Garrido saying that the true antagonists on the current world stage are the Globalists versus the Mahdis. He replied by saying that he could find nothing in my posts on that subject. The reason nothing could be found was that I had never actually written on the subject. In my rather simplistic view I considered this to be a self-evident fact that needed no support. I was wrong. But the question is intriguing and so here goes an expanded thought on the matter.
First The Globalists:
Globalism or Globalization lends itself to several definitions but for the sake of this piece it is meant to refer to the means of production and access to markets. Once upon a time our America was an isolationist nation and the primary goal of industry was to provide goods and services for the American populace. Blue Bell Creamery (Brenham, Texas) famously used a slogan, “we eat all we can and we sell the rest.” That slogan could well have been applied to America’s approach to foreign trade.
The winds of change began to blow in the years just prior to America’s entry into WWII. Europe was already involved but public sentiment in the USA was anti-war and so our direct military support was out of the question. To solve the dilemma of how to bolster Britain’s war effort the “lend-lease” program was developed which arguably spelled the end of American isolationism.
Since the close of WWII there has been a concerted effort on the part of the US government to engage in global nation building, ostensibly to improve and ease foreign relations but when coupled with laws designed to allow manufacturers to minimize costs and maximize profit by relocating off-shore, has had the effect of exporting both the means of production and American jobs.
In this context the obvious end game of dedicated globalists is one world government so as to eliminate those pesky borders that impede the flow of commerce which must then be dealt with through slow, diplomatic negotiations. For the Globalist this is not about politics, simply a step toward establishing “Earth, Inc.”
There are winners and losers in this game. The losers are those industrialized nations which have built a strong middle class through the domestic manufacture and consumption of goods and agriculture. As their manufacturing base erodes they lose jobs and the income necessary to consume goods. In America we have chosen to address this problem by moving millions of our citizens out of the middle class through extended “benefits” in lieu of creating jobs. Unemployment figures are kept low by simply not counting those who have abandoned the job search or who are underemployed, seeking better opportunities. When a family of four, living below the poverty line, can add tens of thousands of dollars in federal and state subsidies to their annual income it is not surprising that there is little outcry against the status quo.
The winners are the manufacturers who add greatly to their bottom line through cheap labor and friendly regulation and those citizens of third world nations who have replaced the American worker. When viewed as one united planet, raising the living standard in one section at the expense of others is not seen as a negative. It is simply bringing about global equality.
Mahdism is extremely complex, not something that would lend itself to full explanation in a forum such as this. The subject of The Mahdi has a history going back 1144 years and many books have been written about it. What is important for this discussion is to explore the influence Mahdism exerts in contemporary times. Rather than attempt to capsulize that which many other writers more skillful than myself have written I will simply provide a few links which the reader may follow, and expand upon, to get a full view of this ancient but current movement.
The important thing to note is that Mahdism is an apocalyptic movement which has highly placed proponents in several legitimate Middle Eastern governments and in fact shapes actions taken by those governments. A close analogy in western society might be if the Christian leaders in the USA, the UK, France and Germany were of a mind to bring about the second coming of Christ by starting the War of Armageddon.
The Globalists as described in this post are not members of some monolithic conspiracy. They are more a group of businesses with with mutually supportive agendas, all acting in what they see as their own best interests. They have no desire to govern, merely to manipulate existing governments in such a way as to render national borders irrelevant. An overriding governmental authority for the entire planet, a super United Nations, would be the ideal end game.
The Mahdis are religious zealots. Their aim is to bring about the return of the 12th Imam and establish a worldwide caliphate under Sharia law.
As these factions continue to work toward their identical goal, a one world government under their control, they will inevitably clash. When it comes to actual engagement on the battlefield, the Mahdis will bring their own armies, the Globalists will use you and me as their surrogates.
This is my view and I welcome yours.